LLAMA results

All results were produced by using the cross-validation splits in the repository with 10 folds and 1 repetitions.
The best values within a type (i.e., baseline (except for vbs), classif, regr and cluster) and performance measure (i.e., Percentage solved, PAR10, MCP) are colored green. Furthermore, the three best values over all groups within a performance measure are colored pink, the absolute best one is red.

The performance is measured in three different ways.

algo model succ par10 mcp
baseline vbs 0.701 3662.241 0.000
baseline singleBest 0.477 6338.901 254.757
baseline singleBestByPar 0.477 6338.901 254.757
baseline singleBestBySuccesses 0.477 6338.901 254.757
classif rpart 0.557 5379.761 145.837
classif randomForest 0.623 4597.806 81.395
classif ksvm 0.622 4616.676 86.260
cluster XMeans 0.495 6118.221 223.522
regr lm 0.592 4961.727 107.506
regr rpart 0.578 5140.133 131.323
regr randomForest 0.649 4293.168 57.886

The following default feature steps were used for model building:

Pre, Basic, KLB, CG

Number of presolved instances: 0

The cost for using the feature steps (adapted for presolving) is: 0 or on average: 0

The feature steps correspond to the following 50 / 115 instance features:

nvarsOrig, nclausesOrig, nvars, nclauses, reducedVars,
reducedClauses, vars_clauses_ratio, POSNEG_RATIO_CLAUSE_mean, POSNEG_RATIO_CLAUSE_coeff_variation, POSNEG_RATIO_CLAUSE_min,
POSNEG_RATIO_CLAUSE_max, POSNEG_RATIO_CLAUSE_entropy, VCG_CLAUSE_mean, VCG_CLAUSE_coeff_variation, VCG_CLAUSE_min,
VCG_CLAUSE_max, VCG_CLAUSE_entropy, UNARY, BINARYp, TRINARYp,
VCG_VAR_mean, VCG_VAR_coeff_variation, VCG_VAR_min, VCG_VAR_max, VCG_VAR_entropy,
POSNEG_RATIO_VAR_mean, POSNEG_RATIO_VAR_stdev, POSNEG_RATIO_VAR_min, POSNEG_RATIO_VAR_max, POSNEG_RATIO_VAR_entropy,
HORNY_VAR_mean, HORNY_VAR_coeff_variation, HORNY_VAR_min, HORNY_VAR_max, HORNY_VAR_entropy,
horn_clauses_fraction, VG_mean, VG_coeff_variation, VG_min, VG_max,
CG_mean, CG_coeff_variation, CG_min, CG_max, CG_entropy,
cluster_coeff_mean, cluster_coeff_coeff_variation, cluster_coeff_min, cluster_coeff_max, cluster_coeff_entropy

Algorithm and Feature Subset Selection

In order to get a better insight of the scenarios, forward selections have been applied to the solvers and features to determine whether small subsets achieve comparable performances. Following this approach, we reduced the number of solvers from 31 to 8, resulting in a PAR10 score of 4281.406 for the reduced model. Analogously, the model that was generated based on 6 of the originally 113 features resulted in a PAR10 score of 4035.973. Below, you can find the list of the selected features and solvers:

Selected Features:
POSNEG_RATIO_CLAUSE_mean, VCG_CLAUSE_coeff_variation, HORNY_VAR_max, VG_min, cl_size_q75,
SP_unconstraint_coeff_variation

Selected Solvers:
clasp2, cryptominisat2011, glueminisat, marchrw, mphaseSAT,
mxc09, sol, sparrow